Inner Travels are cheaper!
Some guys are astronauts, some other astronomers, right?
- The guy who silently watch stars in his telescope sighs : he dreams he had the nerve to go.
- When the rocket launches, the other guy swears he should have stayed on solid ground.
In French, for “on solid ground” we say “sur le plancher des vaches” : “On cows’ floor”.
One explores the world and is disturbed by events, insecurity, unknowns, surprises, propositions, and danger and fear – one wants to go home, dreams of silence.
One lives into a quiet clean living space and sighs – though telling they’re happy & shielded, one wants to hunt, know, meet and explore.
Let’s quote the always funny Schopenhauer :
What to do what to do?
Tango? Try one then another? Find a way to do both? Explore from your quiet place? An astronomer in a rocket? A quiet moving exploring solid shielded bubble?
Thanks for reading!
What’s the destiny of the bourgeois citizen, today, in Occident?
This citizen is hung between freedom and rules, between individuality and links, between pressures and liberty, between imagination and duties, between work and dreams.
It rubs and scrapes. There. In between.
There’s a fracture between the demands and the possibilities.
Where are the levers?
unappeased brain ardors
unappeased brain ardors
Early 1900. A young English (and passionate) woman visits Italy with her chaperon cousin. In the hotel she meets George, a quiet English young man who gives her a kiss. Back to England, she is to be married to Cecil, an inhibited tight ass aristocrat. Of course, the young man and his father find a house not far. “Lucy begins to tell a series of lies, mostly to herself, about what and who she really wants for and in her life”.
A Room with a View. I love this movie and I watched it many times. At the very beginning you understand that you’ll have fun with the shock between upper class English demeanor and the call of life of sunny Italy.
I was amazed how Forster (who wrote the book) draws footbridges within the two universes. Lucy’s family is wealthy and well educated, but fun-loving (her brother is a light hearted music lover). Forster is anticlerical but his priest character is very smart and funny.
You constantly feel the forces of life and daring possibilities moving strongly under the polite British maneers : the fiery writer character who loves to get lost in the city of Firenze, the cousin Charlotte who struggles between rules and what she likes (or liked), Lucy’s family, the way she plays Beethoven, etc. One of the pleasures of the film is to see the pile of lies needed to keep a “respectability”, until the whole thing crashes down…
This scenario should be studied a little more. I wrote this article because of this tool/structure :
- Find two opposite universes A and B.
- Show where are the doors and potential bridges between them.
- Show possibilities, desires, will to discover and explore.
- Show what part of B exists already in A (and vice versa).
- Have fun.
This structure can be used for the two faces of yourself, two merging companies, a new couple… what else?
Thanks for reading!
I love Bertrand Tavernier, a French movie director. One day, as I was watching a movie, something bothered me – but I didn’t find what it was. Then I found.
Movies are made of scenes, and this guy – within many other qualities – knew pretty smartly how to pass from a scene to another. It was so cleverly done!
Paul Valéry says that passages and modulations are the most subtle and fine and sharp secrets the of Arts.
Then he give examples from mother nature, a river, a stem, openings, mountings : there are thousands of types of transitions in nature and life, and it’s most of the time near to perfection.
You see me coming, right?
One could be interested in the “entre-deux”, the “between two”, the middle, the in-between. Studying transitions is another thing. It’s about the movement, choices maybe, combination, says Valéry, of action and matter.
I agree : talent for transitions is one very subtle secret of any art.
Where to apply this? Novels, poetry and writing? Modulations and other changes in music? Life (where to?)? If you work on a project (marketing, teaching, traveling), do you think about transitions?
- Link? Plug? What else?
- Split in two?
- You’re a teacher : where and what kind of transitions do you see?
Mhhh next time I’ll talk about EMERGENCE.
Have a nice day!
Hi everyone! You know me and my tendency to find common structures in things.
Yesterday I was reading about Le Bon Bock (1873), a painting (now in Philadelphia) by E. Manet, which was a big success after the dramatic events in Paris (the Paris Commune, 1871, see here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Commune). It’s been seen as a Type, a sort of philosopher, happy to be quiet, thinking, having a pipe and a good beer.
Then I got questions from my daughter about the Fight Club movie (1999), a huge source of disagreements at the time. I made a web page (in French : https://www.maison-page.net/FC.html), my theory was that the film was a way to dismiss, back to back these two attitudes :
- Being a stupid “capitalist consumer” happy donkey, the unthinking bored dork whose motto is : “Buy things, obey the rules and shut up”.
- Being a dumb nihilist : the excessive-behaviored “useless anarchist” who needs the system (because he wants to “change” it).
What’s the point?
Well, for me, both (the painting/the movie), each in its era, says the same thing implicitly.
Manet painted a guy who is refractory to any form of domination – showing a way out of the boring back-to-back Fight Club criticism. The world is maybe absurd, but there’s a third path, out of the opposition : dumb consumer/dumb rebel.
Waldgänger uses the forest is an article where I explained what is this “Forest Goer” : you stay in the world, but you don’t believe in its bullshit anymore. You step aside… inside your mind. You don’t “quit”, you don’t rebel : you watch and don’t believe in what to see.
Inner retreat. You need it sometimes!…
Thanks for reading!
I call a Lost Kingdom an activity you loved in the past, and you don’t do anymore today.
For me it’s coding (I programmed a lot when I was maybe 15) and composing (from 20 to 25). Today, it’s over.
- In 1993 I had to learn HTML because I wanted to have a clean code for my http://www.maison-page.net – it was delightful, and I have to say I felt this really weird feeling to put on these old shoes. Coding is building something, with immediate tests and gratifications. It’s a little mathematics too. Logic. It puts your brain in a grid of logic, building, making tools. I love it so much! De facto, my page was and stays very fast. Sorry, no PHP or Java here…
- Five years ago I bought a midi keyboard and began to work with GarageBand. It amazed me, gave me pleasure, and I composed maybe 20 or 30 new tracks. And I remember now… not the music, but the state I was in when I was working on them.
The idea of Lost Kingdoms leads me to this idea. Some activities push us in different states. You can play Lego, have a clever conversation for hours, write a poem, take your cam in the countryside, watch a mantis praying, build a cabin in your garden : it’s a “way of thinking”, and your brains knows and recognizes it. Your grow from this.
Lamenting on Kingdoms lost is useless, I agree. Go back to it. Or find new ones : learn an instrument, travel Italy, begin Chinese or horseback riding (question : why not simply “horse riding”??). Bake new cakes . Put your brain in new grids. It’s good, believe me.
Thanks for reading! Have a nice day!
Instagram : teget