Suspiria is a 1977 Italian horror film directed by Dario Argento. Today it’s a classic, grandiose and glossy. It’s also baroque in many ways : decors and colors are vibrant, the music is… not to be outdone.
Considered as a masterpiece, you have today to accept its… exaggerations. If your mind plays the game, it’s a very strange delight, full of great ideas.
When I heard about a remake I facepalmed, like many other movie lovers.
I’ll watch it soon but before that, I read interviews of other directors who reacted on the new Suspiria.
- One saying it was stupid to remake it because the first movie was such a milestone.
- Another one saying it was OK.
- The director, saying it made something totally different, with, for example, colors “à la Fassbinder” (the first Suspiria also happened in Germany).
Tilda Swinton, actress in the new movie, told something very smart (which made me write this article) :
As the story of the first Suspiria is very light (“An American newcomer to a German ballet academy comes to realize that the school is a witches coven”), it can be used like an opera libretto.
I thought it was smart. I know dozens of “Manon Lescaut” or “La Bohème”, the Puccini opera, and each time it’s very interesting to see what they do with the characters, the decor…
I don’t know I feel this is a good tool, but I need help. How can I formalize it?
- “When you think remaking something is useless, but you have to find a good angle to realize it’s not”?
- “When you have to think about something in a new way (borrowing from another field) to find a new interest in it”?
- “Once you have a core, a spirit, you can weave things around, it’ll be interesting to notice the differences”?
- “Working on decisions : let’s keep this from the original/let’s change that”?
What’s the point to remake something frame by frame (like they’ll do with The Lion King)?