A few French Buzzing Guys in Macrophotography, Part 2/2

Being in a park with my cam, finding little guys who, like me, try to live, brings me a kiddo pleasure, like when I followed ants with my magnifier, when I was 10. Here’s my “Come and see”s of the day :



A few French Buzzing Guys in Macrophotography, Part 1/2

Don’t worry, it’s the North of France in a park in May, insects here are cute and harmless. Not tarantulas or mantis here, nobody bites. A few little guys though, dreamy ladybugs, tired bumblebees, or bees bathing in the yellow. Say Hi?

Abeilles, bourdon, demoiselle, fourmis, mouche verte, coccinelle…


IMG_8692IMG_8768 2IMG_8821IMG_8824 2IMG_8892IMG_8990

2 Lists about Motivation

Motivation? Cool!

WHY do we do things? HOW do we motivate people (at school, at work)?

There are books about that, don’t worry. Today I give you two lists around the concept, extracted from a new French book.


In human sciences, psychology or even pedagogy, the concept of motivation is often ignored or despised. Because :

  1. Denial : Motivation is a useless artificial concept invented to describe states one can’t explain.
  2. Indifference : The idea of “something makes us act” is an evidence, but what could we do with that?
  3. Resignation : Pessimistically – “you’re motivated or you’re not, that’s all”.
  4. Incantation : Optimistically, but the same thing – we’re motivated by a mysterious “energy” which automatically push people into action.

I find so funny and great to list reasons why people are NOT motivated to study a concept like motivation!

And I wonder where we could use this list of “We don’t, because…”.


In another part of this Preface, I found a list of Old Big Systems (like Structuralism, Marxism, etc…) which, in the XXth Century, studied our concept.

Our citizen, our subject was studied these ways :

  1. The Subject-Habitus, poor one, is alienated by his existence, his social class, his position in culture and economy, he is the propensity guy.
  2. The Subject-Pulsion, the happy idiot, is the puppet of his complex unconscious subconscious.
  3. The Subject-Response, a behaviorist, just reacts to stimulations from his environment, he is conditioned.
  4. The Subject-Demiurge, a humanist tending to fulfill himself in his all-empowered freedoooommm.
  5. The Subject-Arbitrator, the haecceitist, aware that all his life is a combination of changes and possibilities, whose plays with intentions, proposition, emotions, thinking, obligations and goals. He is the co-author of his own story.

We didn’t even talk about the Theory of Motivation in itself. Maybe later?

Thanks for reading!