The boats of Fitz Henry Lane, luminist American painter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitz_Henry_Lane

 

Fitz Henry Lane (1804-1865) was a “luminist” painter. He painted… mostly boats.

He’s on my border, this is why I put him here…

Above this border, it’s too academic, therefore boring. In Art, I like the “Hey this is new!” state, raising eyebrows, etc.

Nothing like that with Lane! But there’s this I-don’t-know-what which makes me watch more. Like the hesitating emoji holding his chin…

“Too wise”. “Too conventional”. “Lack of energy”. “Lack of surprises”. “Bland”. “Pff”.

Eyes want to roll. But they don’t.

Thus I wrote this article to think about this pattern : when you watch something you find “too conventional BUT”.

“Nope. Wait a minute…” : this, in loop.

 

Therefore, where is it? Where is this frontier? Aesthetics? Mood? Light? What about choices? What about other arts? What’s this loop in… propositions? In poetry? What is a music you don’t like BUT you want to stick on it to find what you “do like, though”? What is to be on this border? Is it lukewarm? Could this hesitation be useful? For what?

 

Thanks for reading!

 

77196e3a03794d94ec778946c6e7a57cAC1993.229.1Fitz_Henry_Lane_-_Brace's_RockTD.M18980 Close Hauled in a Gale

Advertisements

Denis Sarazhin, Ukrainian Painter

http://sarazhin-denis.com/catalog/paintings
https://www.instagram.com/denis_sarazhin

Denis Sarazhin (he’s born in 1982) has a style. He seems to be obsessed by hands, and long twisted bodies. He has something of Vroubel, of Segantini.

Have a great day!

Denis+Sarazhin+++TuttArt+63

larger

Denis+Sarazhin+++TuttArt+9

cSARA 138 Polina

cSARA 100 Early Spring

cSARA 83 Portrait in Scarf

26f15d5b7e78a5bc44eb069fad1a4943

9f750902e30b50a5fd4f08aae98e44ec

 

A Rock in the Current : the Hammershøi Paradigm

V. Hammershøi (1864-1916) was a Danish painter who, in the splendid middle of modernity, stayed in conservatism.

The core of Art, says G. Deleuze, is “What newness does it bring?”. It’s essential, of course, and any good Art History focuses on this force of progress. Art is moving forward. Each important artist, in music or painting, brought something new.

On all the keyboard of a discipline, the “newness” is very funny to study. It’s why I am currently reading a Manet biography. It’s why I love Fellini or Godard in cinema, or Bartok and Debussy in classical music.

Jubilation, it is what you get in front of invention.

But.

There’s always a time when you see there’s a rock in the current.

Well, there’s a pleasure in Art exploration in seeing the one who stays behind, in “his style”, when the whole “correct” colleagues seems to push forward. Hammershøi? It was the time of Van Gogh and Cézanne!

As for every domain, it’s splendid to study “conservatives”. To find out why, what were their motivations. “Where” they were evolving all the same. What they said, wrote, decided. Were they aware of the progresses outside? What they did from the movements they saw. Little elements? A slight change? Nothing at all?

Are and when these artist are re-discovered?

I what other domains should we sometimes watch the unevolving strong rocks in the current? Why? What do we learn?

Thanks for reading!

 

Vilhelm-Hammershøi-Vilhelm-Hammershoi-painting-danemark-painter-methahysique-auction-sotheby

 

 

 

Ben Aronson, “urban scenes” American Painter

I’ve a problem with Ben Aronson. His work always makes me balance like a pendulum, between :

  1. Naah this guy is too dexterous, he paints too much, he trusts too much his talents, it’s crafty knacky laziness, like “I know I’m good, fuck it”.
  2. Ohhh this is so exquisito-gorgeous! Look at this light! Vibrating! We could almost feel the wind and the sun and the shadows and hear the cars. He got the mood and heart of this street!

Therefore I keep watching. His flowers are gorgeous. I admit he “felt” Paris’ streets. I like when he’s attracted to more abstraction. I like this paradox, it’s realistic but not at all : there’s a pendulum with expressionism, a speed, a movement. It’s realistic from afar, but not at all if you look closer…

Thanks for reading!

JP

 

 

 

3bje8ojsVi1504215293

 

4a5b582b4167d806689690a3c6c26c2d--urban-landscape-ben-aronson

 

6IJ1Lwd4Ku1504301775

 

48047801_1_x

 

b0b73b43a019cc5a5bfc4139a8d043fa

 

ben_aronson_-_usa_(33)

 

I4ntcStthA1504300806

 

larger

 

 

The Cityscapes of Ben Aronson

 

yellow-awning-paris

Peter Sculthorpe, Delaware Painter

http://www.petersculthorpe.com/

Classical, meticulous, American. I’m unable to say what I like in this work. Sculthorpe is a good technician. He paints a lot (I found plenty on the web). I think I liked the first one very much, then I searched a lot for others.

Many painters have an “intention” – and we love that! But he seems to want just to show us how it is. It’s so quiet…

Though it looks like photography, there’s something different. A slight something (look at the first one, this night…). Nevertheless, it’s not haunting like Wyeth.

I don’t know. I love the way he loves the light. What do you think?

Have a nice day!

 

Jean-Pascal

 

 

Moonscape

 

LastLight

 

de_art_20141119_1763721618

 

blackduckcove

 

54aee43d1067fb02f7d753751e4b36cc

 

BuckandDoeRun

 

c6c205f85214a4b5a3a59b627ce029a0

 

PS-Farm-on-the-New-Road-sm-e1502205440579

 

ProposalRock

 

Peter-Sculthorpe-Day-End-Calm-151890-154060

 

Raoul Hynckes – Dutch/Belgian painter

Raoul Hynckes (1893-1973) was a Dutch/Belgian painter. Long life, different styles! Impressionism, still lifes, and then “this” realism I love so much : trying to capture the soul or the moment of a place. Yes, like Stephen Shore did at times in the USA…

There’s nobody, only places. These places say something, right? I love his sunny/shade work…

 

Have a nice day!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raoul_Hynckes

4037

 

HynckesR_Gracht_te_Amsterdam3782

 

17bdced9e0ae2cd0d5131894493d577e

 

HynckesR_Viaduct_10-2014_pol_2001_01

 

2547

 

tumblr_nupyvnPSDJ1s73l3po1_1280

 

3 Quotes from Manet : a toolwaltz for artists, painters, thinkers…

“It is not enough to know your craft – you have to have feeling. Science is all very well, but for us imagination is worth far more”.

 

“There is only one true thing: Instantly paint what you see”.

 

“But to have spontaneity, one must be master of his art”.

 

Edouard Manet

 

These are good little seeds for artists, thinkers, and artists thinkers.

The middle one is linked to the 1st & 3rd.

The pack is like a loop, right? 1 – 2 – 3 then again. A braid.

Tool :

What’s your braid? When you write a poem, do you tell a story, do you picture a place or a mood, do you work on words as elements : jewelry or photography? If you’re a teacher, what do you weave? Watching the class, the students one by one? Do you invent, or do you follow? In jazz, do you listen to others or do you lead? What about sex? Marketing? Leading a battle? Politics? Making a speech? Being an actor? Conversation?

As always, it’s about

  1. thinking about what you’re doing
  2. draw or find lines, frontiers (spontaneity/mastering, freedom/constraint, casual/focus, one tree/the forest, respect rules/mind of your own, etc)
  3. choose how to balance
  4. move cursors (and pan scales) is necessery
  5. be aware of all of it
  6. or not

 

Thanks for reading!

 

Some examples :

 

 

“An artist should be a spontanéiste. There’s the right term. But to have spontaneity, one must be master of his art. Undirected groping never leads anywhere. One must translate one experiences, but translate it instantaneously, so to speak”

Manet

Edouard_Manet_-_Berthe_Morisot_With_a_Bouquet_of_Violets_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg